It is time for everyone interested in outdoor recreation and
productive natural resource management to get behind Sen. Jon Tester's
Forest Jobs and Recreation bill. We have been in a 35-year management
stalemate since the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation, RARE I and II
studies of the 1970s.
The RARE studies set out all of the areas the
U.S. Forest Service recommended for wilderness classification. Since
then, those areas plus many others including large buffer zones have
been managed to protect wilderness qualities. Any attempts at resource
extraction have been met with expensive litigation.
A number of proposals have been worked on by thousands of us in the
ensuing years. One of the most similar was the Lolo/Kootenai Accords in
the early 1980s. A large group representing all interests from miners
and loggers to strong wilderness advocates, got together to produce a
seemingly impossible document that would delineate all wilderness and
general forest zones on the Kootenai and Lolo National Forests.
Despite
original doubts, the task was accomplished after hundreds of hours of
meetings. The only reason for failure was a new senator who didn't want
more wilderness and was out to make a point.
He didn't consider that at least 50 percent of the effort was put forth by
his supporters. If that bill had passed, there would no doubt be more
lumber mills still in business, operating under sustained yield forest
management practices.
I have been an avid outdoorsman and hunter for over 55 years, starting
work with the U.S. Forest Service as an assistant packer in 1964.
I worked for a commercial outfitter, as well as having my own small
outfitting business for a few years. Elk hunting and horse pack trips
into non-motorized areas are my most cherished experiences as a
Montanan.
I understand how difficult it is to balance all opinions where public
lands are concerned, and how important these lands are to private
businesses in Montana.
Sen. Tester's bill respects private business and puts job creation out front
as a primary goal, along with setting aside those lands that deserve
protection for diverse recreational uses. Fortunately Sen. Tester
understands both sides and does not consider them mutually exclusive.
We should all applaud the effort Jon Tester and hundreds of citizens have put forth to create S1470.
I would also like to commend Sen. Max Baucus for his support and Rep.
Rehberg for his efforts to understand the public's concerns.
Bipartisan collaboration and support for S1470 is what Montanans expect and deserve.
I would like to invite Rep. Rehberg to hold an organized listening
session in Missoula with designated speakers from every possible
interest group.
It is time to end the stalemate and pass legislation for a more productive and certain future.